Cross-Cultural Training (CCT)
entry by Julie M. Marx, Global Family Expert at Expat Valley
Structured educational interventions designed to prepare individuals and families for effective functioning in a culturally different environment. May be delivered pre-departure, post-arrival, or both, and ranges from information-based approaches — area briefings, cultural orientation — to experiential and immersive methods aimed at developing deeper intercultural sensitivity.
Comparable terms
Cultural orientation (HR/mobility, destination services — typically refers to pre-departure information delivery; narrower than CCT) · Pre-departure training (HR/mobility — timing-specific variant) · Intercultural training (education, training — preferred in academic and practitioner contexts; emphasizes competence development over information transfer) · Cultural awareness training (HR — common corporate variant; contested for implying superficial exposure)
Why this matters
Cross-cultural training is one of the few levers organizations can pull before a move to reduce culture shock and assignment failure. It builds realistic expectations, skills, and confidence for all family members. Done well, it improves relationships with host-country colleagues, schools, and communities.
Cross-references
Intercultural Trainer (Professional Support Roles); Intercultural Competence (Cultural Adaptation); DMIS (Cultural Adaptation); IDI (Cultural Adaptation); CQ (Cultural Adaptation); Soft Landing (Transitions & Mobility); Assignment Success (Transitions & Mobility). The DMIS is the developmental theory most commonly used to design CCT programs; the IDI is the instrument used to assess pre- and post-training intercultural development. CQ provides an alternative assessment framework for CCT outcomes. Soft landing and assignment success are the two primary outcome metrics against which CCT effectiveness is most usefully evaluated.
Sources
Black and Mendenhall’s foundational review found that cross-cultural training is associated with three categories of positive outcome: feelings of wellbeing and self-confidence, development of appropriate behaviors in the host culture context, and improvement of relationships with host country nationals. Black, J.S. & Mendenhall, M. (1990). Cross-cultural training effectiveness: A review and a theoretical framework for future research. Academy of Management Review, 15(1), 113–136.
Another article with similar claims is Daniel J. Kealey, David R. Protheroe (1996). The effectiveness of cross-cultural training for expatriates: An assessment of the literature on the issue. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, Volume 20, Issue 2, 141-165.
CCT effectiveness evidence has been subject to methodological critique. For a more recent meta-analytic treatment, see: Morris, M.A. & Robie, C. (2001). A meta-analysis of the effects of cross-cultural training on expatriate performance and adjustment. International Journal of Training and Development, 5(2), 112–125.
« Back